Extreme Networks ExtremeRouting SLX 9640 - router - rack-mountable

$92,843.00

Save $40434.36

$52,408.64

Mfg # EN-SLX-9640-24S-AC-F CDW # 5999025 | UNSPSC 43222609

Extreme Networks ExtremeRouting SLX 9640 - router - rack-mountable

Quick tech specs

24-port switch
front to back airflow

router
40GbE, 100GbE, 25GbE, 50GbE
rack-mountable

View All

Know your gear

With cloud services, 4K HD video streaming, Internet of Things (IoT), and mobile connectivity for billions of devices becoming standard, organizations must modernize the way they communicate and conduct business. Increasingly organizations are expanding from on premise, private and hybrid cloud to full multi-cloud architectures to address agility, scale, security, reliability and cost requirements as digital transformation reshapes their business environment.

To succeed in the digital era, organizations need network platforms with the adaptability to address these rapidly evolving demands and enable them to simplify and scale operations while driving down cost. Such platforms deliver innovative software optimized with programmable hardware to analyze and automate network operations, thereby reducing OpEx, and provide flexible deployment options with forwarding performance and scale to dramatically reduce CapEx.

$92,843.00

Save $40434.36

$52,408.64

Advertised Price

Lease Pricing Available

Reviews

(5)

Availability: 11-13+ Days

Expected in-stock date for this item is between 11-13 days. Item will ship once it is in stock.

Add to Compare

Save to Favorites

Choose a Warranty

No Protection Plan

Extreme Networks ExtremeWorks NBD Advanced Hardware Replacement - extended

Lowest Price

$9,584.97

Advertised Price

View Details

More Warranties

Show More Information (if available)

Router Modules & Accessories Top Products

Warranties

Extreme Networks ExtremeWorks NBD Advanced Hardware Replacem...
Extended service agreement

advance parts replacement

1 year
Lowest Price

$9,584.97

Advertised Price

Reviews

4.2/5

5 Total

Reviews by Ratings

5 Stars 20%

4 Stars 80%

3 Stars 0%

2 Stars 0%

1 Stars 0%

1-5 of 5 reviews

Clear All Filters

By Imran Taiyeb Ali - November 21, 2023

A scalable tool that needs to improve its support, software resiliency, and software stability

What is our primary use case? My company uses ExtremeRouting for a big LAN environment, where there is a need for ERS switches, including Extreme Networks Core Switches and chassis, so the product is like a big cabinet to reduce chassis redundancy. The product is useful for LAN networks, especially when there is traffic from supposedly 500 or 1,000 users, and you want to get the traffic from the access layer to Extreme Networks Core Switch. The product's physical architecture of the box, chipsets, and load capacity are extremely good. The product was one of the best in the market in the past, but because of the support it offers, it got out of the market. In general, the product's hardware part is very good. What needs improvement? I think that all the devices included in Avaya fall under Extreme Networks currently. I am not sure how much Extreme Networks has changed ExtremeRouting, but I think it is in a better condition than Avaya. The support, software resiliency, and software stability are areas of concern where improvements are required. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using ExtremeRouting for four years. I am a user of the product. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The stability of the product is poor because of its software, but otherwise, the device is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a six and a half out of ten. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. How are customer service and support? The support team is not technically that strong. The previous company that owned the product, Nortel, went bankrupt, after which the transition phase of the product didn't go smoothly. Avaya did not do well with the product's design and engineering after taking the product over from Nortel, after which Avaya decided to outsource the tool to my company, meaning we have worked as a vendor with third-party access to the tool in the name of Avaya. The support was very bad initially, but my company could fix the problems of the customers on time since we had better communication skills than technical-solving skills due to our limitations related to the area of device engineering. When it comes to a feature of the product, my company could enable it for the customers or users of the product. If, by any chance, my company found a bug in the tool, then it was a hectic task for our support team to deal with it since it took months to fix it. Currently, Extreme Networks takes care of the support part, and it might have improved. I rate the technical support a four out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral How was the initial setup? The product's initial setup phase was easy or of an intermediate level of difficulty. What other advice do I have? The physical device architecture of the product has the same RJ-45 copper ports, fiber ports, one gig, and ten gig, and in my company, we have never found any issue concerning the device failure, meaning the device failure rate was very low. The device can work for a long time, but if you upgrade it, then there is no confirmation of how it will behave since its vendor changed from Nortel to Avaya. With Avaya as software, my company's engineering team was not that good at fixing the bugs, so my company's customers, who have been using the box from Extreme Networks for 20 years, know more about the product than our company since we got involved in the system's support only three years ago. When my company suggested to our customers that they upgrade the product, they denied accepting our recommendation by stating that they didn't need any extra features since they were unsure if the new software would fix it. The device has a limitation on the software part. The device usually works in very adverse conditions since it has a very good architecture. For those who have the option to get good support for the device, then I would definitely recommend the product to them. I rate the overall tool a seven out of ten. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? My company uses ExtremeRouting for a big LAN environment, where there is a need for ERS switches, including Extreme Networks Core Switches and chassis, so the product is like a big cabinet to reduce chassis redundancy. The product is useful for LAN networks, especially when there Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Ngwenu Basoli - October 9, 2023

Works well for both corporate and educational needs

What is our primary use case? I mainly use ExtremeRouting in office settings to improve office processes and manage networks. I have used it for educational demos in schools too, making it useful for education. It is a versatile networking solution that works well for both corporate and educational needs, and Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By LuisBrown - November 28, 2022

Efficient routing; good pricing

What is our primary use case? Our primary use case is routing. We are currently in the process of implementing the FabricOS here pretty soon, which is their alternative to the standard, what's called XOS, ExtremeOS, which is a more traditional switching and routing model, very akin to Cisco with a similar command line structure. With the routing capabilities, you basically have a way to turn your entire infrastructure across multiple locations into what looks like essentially one large switch, so routing becomes efficient. You can let VLANs talk to each other and control anyway through access control list. What is most valuable? I think their most valuable feature is their FabricOS. With this feature, we have the ability to virtualize the entire network infrastructure across multiple locations and multiple switches. Secondary to that, is their auto detect auto sense capability, which you can actually configure so that you do not have to preconfigure ports. You can simply plug a device in, and if it's based on several parameters and some rule sets, it will decide how to configure that port, what VLANs to connect to it, and where to connect it and where to route it based on what the device is. What needs improvement? My advice for those looking into ExtremeRouting is: right now all switch manufacturers are backed up for months. If you're looking to implement quickly, I would say shop around a bit because it might be difficult. For how long have I used the solution? I have about a year of experience with ExtremeRouting. What do I think about the stability of the solution? So far it's so good. We have not had any failures that I know of where a piece of equipment actually failed and I think we've had to reboot one switch once. In the last instance, the issue had more to do with the interoperability of the Extreme fiber interfaces with Cisco at the other end. The interoperability can be a little tricky at times. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? ExtremeRouting's stability is solid as far as I can tell. However, I have only used it with our village, which encompasses some 1,000 users. Looking at the robustness, I do not know whether it would be carrier grade – let's say for hundreds of thousands of users – but it certainly doesn't balk at 10,000 users or less. How was the initial setup? My impression of the initial setup is that it was pretty straightforward. You get a new device; you put a cloud app on your phone; you take a picture of a barcode and of a QR code; and it integrates that device into your infrastructure. It's very quick and easy. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? In terms of the pricing, you probably could get an average premises switch for about $500 a year in total and the management license. For the most part, there are not any additional costs to the standard licensing fee. On some of the lower end switches, if you want to run 10 GB, you have to pay $100 a year or so extra to get the 10 GB license. That's the 5300 series and below, not the ones we use. What other advice do I have? ExtremeRouting's prices are at least 30% less than Cisco as a competitor in management. Extreme IQ, in spite of any of the shortcomings, is still quite superior to Meraki, especially when you bring in the SD-WAN and the Fabric capabilities that Meraki can't even touch. Overall, ExtremeRouting requires less technical depth in order to implement the infrastructure than Cisco, for example. However, Cisco is bigger, Cisco's got more firepower when it comes to maintaining stuff. Not that I've ever had any kind of failure rates with ExtremeRouting equipment. ExtremeRouting is a smaller company and in my experience smaller companies can be more responsive, especially for the smaller guys like me. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? Our primary use case is routing. We are currently in the process of implementing the FabricOS here pretty soon, which is their alternative to the standard, what's called XOS, ExtremeOS, which is a more traditional switching and routing model, very akin to Cisco with a similar comm Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By Sachin Vinay - September 24, 2022

A budget-friendly solution providing internal and external routing

What is our primary use case? Our primary use case for this solution is extreme routing. We have about ten to 12 buildings, so this product provides internal and external routing through the ExtremeRouting mechanism. Additionally, we have routing protocols, like OSPF, and RIP. What is most valuable? We have found the extreme stacking feature very valuable. It is stable, and we use it often in our processes as it provides a good redundancy technique. Additionally, the product offers a good maximum value for its attributes. What needs improvement? The product could be improved by including the latest protocols to match the other vendor standards because some of the latest protocols are unavailable. So when we mix this device with other companies and vendors like 48 or Cisco, we have issues because ExtremeRouting uses more of these proprietary protocols. Hence, they can improve by adding the latest protocols to the data. For how long have I used the solution? We have been using this solution for eight years and it is deployed on-premises. What do I think about the stability of the solution? The solution is stable. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? The solution is scalable, and there are currently four people using this solution in the organization. However, we intend to increase the usage of this solution eventually. How are customer service and support? We have not had a very good experience with customer service and support. We have experienced issues with technical support, which is time-consuming. We don't get the required input we need from the support team. I rate to support a six out of ten. How would you rate customer service and support? Neutral Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? We previously did not use any other solutions. How was the initial setup? The initial setup was straightforward. What about the implementation team? The solution was deployed in-house and took approximately one week. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Unfortunately, I cannot comment on licensing costs at this time. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We evaluated Cisco routers. We primarily compared Cisco with ExtremeRouting and chose ExtremeRouting because it was more user-friendly and budget-friendly. Compared to Cisco, ExtremeRouting is cheap and has an easy configuration process. What other advice do I have? I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The solution is good but can be improved by including advanced protocols. Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions. What is our primary use case? Our primary use case for this solution is extreme routing. We have about ten to 12 buildings, so this product provides internal and external routing through the ExtremeRouting mechanism. Additionally, we have routing protocols, like OSPF, and RIP. What is most valuable? We have Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot

By reviewer1338396 - July 22, 2021

Easy to scale, stable, and comparable pricing but it needs to evolve and be more modern

What is our primary use case? We use this solution in the bank. We will migrate the solution that we currently have on-premises to a SaaS solution. What needs improvement? We are concerned with how the solution will evolve to the next generation of Contact Center. It's not evolving as quickly as we would li Read more

Written by a user while visiting PeerSpot