Texas Instruments TI-30X IIS Teacher Kit - scientific calculator
$139.64
Mfg # 30XIISTKT1L1B
CDW # 1644923
| UNSPSC 44101800
Quick tech specs
- 30X IIS Teacher Kit
- 10 digits + 2 exponents
- Scientific calculator
- solar panel, battery (pack of 10)
Know your gear
This fundamental, two-line calculator combines statistics and advanced scientific functions for high school math and science.
Add to Compare
Enhance your purchase
Texas Instruments 30XIIS Teacher Kit is rated4.00 out of5 by2.
Rated 5 out of 5 byDevopsavm67 from A stable, somewhat scalable solution that needs lots of training when elements are upgradedWhat is our primary use case?We primarily use the solution for a publishing website.What is most valuable?The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools.What needs improvement?Different parameters in this product can be a bit difficult. As soon as you introduce something new, and especially in the Microsoft environment, you always need to do new training sessions to understand what are new functionalities are. Finding the correct options are not more intuitive, and it should be.For how long have I used the solution?I've been using the solution pretty much since it was first released.What do I think about the stability of the solution?The solution is very stable.What do I think about the scalability of the solution?The scalability depends on how you have set it up. If you're running IIS on a single server, it might not be as capable as if you are on many in a cluster or with load balancing and so on.How are customer service and technical support?We don't a contact for technical support, so I mostly have to cross my fingers and hope that nothing goes wrong.How was the initial setup?I wasn't around for the initial setup, but I can say that we started fairly simple, and it's grown more and more complex as time has gone on.What other advice do I have?We use the on-premises deployment model.The solution is stable, it is working, and you can do a lot with this, but it is not my favorite product. I would prefer to use something that was open-source instead. I would rate it seven out of ten.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2019-09-06T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byit_user266553 from ?It needs a more compact configuration, but the clustering feature is valuable.Valuable Features* Clustering* Application isolationRoom for ImprovementIt needs a more compact configuration.Use of SolutionI've used it for one year.Deployment IssuesNo issues encountered.Stability IssuesIt depends on the load of the server, but we have not had an issue.Scalability IssuesNo issues encountered.Customer Service and Technical SupportCustomer Service: I've not used customer service.Technical Support: I've not used technical support.Previous SolutionsWe switched because of the nature of the application and technology.Initial SetupI always design my systems simple and keep them simple as possible.Implementation TeamWe implemented it with in-house team. We like to keep the knowledge in-house.ROIIt was crucial and it definitely paid off.Pricing, Setup Cost and LicensingKeep the systems simple. Try to work with open-source solutions and pay for technical support and subscription to support the projects.Other Solutions ConsideredYes, I always and regularly evaluate. In case of Java we evaluated all applications servers which support JEE full profile.Other AdviceI was using Apache Tomcat, JBoss AS (RedHat), WebMethods (Software AG) and IIS (Microsoft). All of them have they specialities, but depending on the goals and purpose it’s quiet easy to make a choice. Products based on Microsoft .NET do not give companies lot of options; either with Server Operating System shipped IIS, or the developer version called IIS Express. Applications written in Java, n opposite, can be accommodated on several fully profiled or non-fully-profiled application or web servers.Only have one application per server if possible. Do not over complicate it, and keep the variance in the configuration simple as possible.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2015-07-05T00:00:00-04:00
Rated 5 out of 5 byGh0ce from For us it's a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpagesHow has it helped my organization?It allowed us to set up and use a Windows Server we had in place already to host our internal web page.What is most valuable?It is a lightweight web host that is easy to configure for simple webpages.What needs improvement?Finding different settings can be difficult if you don't know where to look.For how long have I used the solution?More than five years.What do I think about the stability of the solution?Stability seems good.What do I think about the scalability of the solution?We have not needed to scale out with it, as we use it for very lightweight things.How is customer service and technical support?I have not needed to contact technical support.Which solutions did we use previously?I have tried other tools (such as Apache), and found that IIS is more stable and easier on the memory for low resource systems.How was the initial setup?Initial setup is straightforward for a basic setup (e.g. one host hosting HTTP traffic), but can get more complicated the more features you want to add (e.g. Windows Authentication, HTTPs, web farm, etc.).What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?It is licensed with your Windows installation which makes it relatively cheap if you already have a Windows Server sitting around.Which other solutions did I evaluate?We also evaluated Apache, but found that IIS was easier to set up for what we wanted.What other advice do I have?Give it a shot. The features are included for free with Windows, so test it out. If you are unhappy, it is easy to disable and switch to a different solution.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2018-01-21T00:00:00-05:00
Rated 5 out of 5 bySrSymEngineer from Authentication for network appliances became easy to do but the monitoring needs improvementValuable Features* Easy to set-up* Good to maintainImprovements to My OrganizationThis made the security set-up easier and authentication simplified.Room for Improvement* Logging* MonitoringUse of SolutionI've used Microsoft NPS for four years.Deployment IssuesNo issues encountered.Stability IssuesNo issues encountered.Scalability IssuesNo issues encountered but always gor for two machines as one isn't enough and isn't fault redundant.Customer Service and Technical SupportCustomer Service: Haven't needed it yet.Technical Support: Haven't needed it yet.Previous SolutionsYes, we used RSA Radius. It was very hard to maintain and outdated.Initial SetupStraightforward, it's a feature of Windows Server and a basic knowledge of the radius principles are enough.Implementation TeamIn-house implementation.ROIPretty good. Authentication for network appliances, load balancing products and wireless devices became easy to do.Pricing, Setup Cost and LicensingIt came with the Microsoft contract.Other Solutions ConsideredNo, we were unhappy with RSA Radius so we went for the 'free' solution.Other AdviceIt has many features, make sure they satisfy your needs.Disclaimer: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Date published: 2015-01-26T00:00:00-05:00